Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
The Columbia Star
Columbia, South Carolina
September 8, 2006     The Columbia Star
PAGE 5     (5 of 18 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 5     (5 of 18 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
September 8, 2006
 
Newspaper Archive of The Columbia Star produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2024. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




The Columbia Star SC SEPTEMBER 8. 2006 5 trio Mike Maddock There is a trend in education called the family project. In a perfect world, the family project should bring a smile to your face and warm your heart. Think about it. Proud moms, dads, and their chil- dren are seated around the kitchen table with some Elmer's Glue, a pile of con- struction paper, and those little scissors that couldn't cut through a stick of butter. Together, the parents and kids are discussing the intri- cacies of the Revolutionary War while constructing a scale model of George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River. No timeta- bles no worries just hours of quality time between adults and children. But this isn't a perfect world, is it? The reality is more like this. Mum and Dad have either forgotten about this project or little Junior has put it off to the last possible second. Suddenl3; a normal, hectic night turns into com- plete pandemonium. Mum is torn between teaching her child a hard lesson and letting that child suffer the embarrassment of an incomplete project or suffering the embarrassment herself when Timmy and his perfect mum show up to class with a Gettysburg doc- umentary that would make Ken Bums a little jealous. Dad is having flash- backs to his sophomore year in high school when he was a world-class procrastinator himself. He could have got- ten an A on his science proj- ect by studying the effects of cigarette smoke on the Himalayan hissing cock- roach over the course of sev- eral months, but instead he settled for a D on a volcano pitifully constructed the night before the due date. , The result is that a nice evening at home is sud- denly turned into a free--for-all. Mum is doing her best MacGyver imitation trying to turn a pizza box, a couple of paper clips, and a slightly used coloring book into the Delaware River, while dad is mumbling something about baking soda and vinegar. Meanwhile the two perfectly innocent siblings are living out aLord of the Flies fanta- sy in the playroom because they have been forced to rough it out and survive the rest of the night on their own. It's not pretty. After a lot of crying and fussing, Mum finally sends Dad to the playroom with a box of tissues and a shield to deal with the sud- denly native other children. Mum manages to throw something together with her child and teach her not only something about the birth of our nation, but about the evils of procrastination. "You don't want to end up like your father, do you?" The next day Mum takes her child to school with the completed project in hand trying desperately to avoid Timmy and his perfect mum. I'm all for family proj- ects. I just don't want my child's grade depending on it. Let me handle the family togetherness. We've got some bushes that need planting, and the playroom could always use a good cleaning out. I've paid my dues. Nearly two decades of school definitely taught me one thing; I don't want to go to school anymore. It's time to give my kids the home- work and pass on a legacy of learning that may include a few volcanic flashbacks for my kids and their class- mates. No cell phones in this courtroom! Cell phones now seem to be a permanent part of an American's profile. Many subscribers are canceling hard- wire phones at home in favor of the completely portable cell .phones. Everybody uses them, from teens to seniors. I've seen teens walking two feet apart in the mall, talking to each other on cell phones. Surveys on cell phone use report that men talk- more often than women, but women talk longer. Sounds about right to me. But three people using cell phones ran afoul of the law last month in Indiana. The scene was in criminal court where signs were posted in the hallway: "Turn off cell phones." As court was gaveled into session, County Criminal Court Judge Diane Boswell warned: "I want cell phones turned off in this courtroom." Moments later the sound of cell phones ringing echoed throughout the courtroom. It seemed the sound came from the second row of spectators. Nobody would admit their cell phone rang, so the judge ordered the bailiff to move all five people to seats normally reserved for jail prisoners. Even after that, one cell phone rang again. An hour later, when court concluded, the judge turned her full attention to the cell people. One of them claimed what the judge heard was his cell phone "powering down" after he turned it off. When all was said and done, three of the five people were charged with contempt of court, for not turning off their cell phones as ordered. One woman agreed to pay a $100 fine, but the other two were sentenced to 40 hours of community service. Don't these folks have a "vibrate" setting, and don't unanswered calls automatically go into a voice message box? Cell phones in restaurants are also annoying, although not illegal. Why do people have to talk so loud on their cell phone? And why do they talk at all when they're in a movie theater? What we need is a code of good manners for cell phone users. Good manners? What an archaic topic that is. C llthecops@sc.rr.com Mike Cox Things used to be so simple. I could grab a bag of Cheez-Its and a Michelob, turn the TV to Keith Jackson on a September Saturda and relax, knowing ABC would give me football with- out any unnecessary frills. After the game was over, I could relax with a glass of milk and a few Oreos; the World was fine and I was in tune with it. Then everything started to get complicated. We needed more choices. At least the advertisers told us we need- ed more choices. Michelob got Light. Then along came Michelob Ultra, then Ultra Amber. Now there are countless beers out there, but when you look closer, most have Anheuser-Busch or Miller in fine print on the label.We appear to have a multitude of choices, butwe really are just being overwhelmed with mediocrity. Cheez-Its now come in different flavors, shapes, and combinations. Maybe the most perfect snack food on the planet is being improved. My kids used to say ifI had beer and Cheez-Its, everything else was tolerable. So who needs Cheez-It snack mix, or those twisted things that get orange god on your fingers? If I want that, I'll buy Chee- tos. Then Oreos started fooling with the formula. Again, a near perfect snack food was changed. First Double Stuf, like we need more calories. Then choco- late covered. (These should be an illegal substance. They are just too good for human consumption.) And last week in Publix, I saw a pack of Oreos with some French on the package. I have no idea what they were sup- posed to be. While these insane, mad food scientists have been fooling with our pre- cious snacks and beverages, the sports world has evolved into a complicated, mud- died mess of hi-tech driven, information overload. When ABC introduced the irritat- ing Jim Lampley as a side- line reporter, everyone knew it was not a good thing. But no one realized it would turn into what we are now cursed with. Every sports broad- cast features all sorts of graphics; the score and important current informa- tion in one corner of the screen; a scrolling info line at the bottom telling the viewer all sorts of useless stuff.We even have a com- puter generated yellow line ! showing us where the first down is. No longer do we breathlessly await the offi- cial's measurement. Last Monday night's Full Circle broadcast of the Miami--Florida State game featured so much informa- tion it was impossible to understand what was going on. Every one of ESPN's three hundred networks offered a different view of the game, from regular TV to Hi-Def, to six screen, geek-attracting, informa- tion overload. A particular network even featured commentary by an ESPN radio personali- ty, one of the idiots I spent several hundred dollars on satellite radio just to get away from. Do they think I want to listen to him? But I couldn't find the mute button on the compli- cated remote and besides, there was orange god all over my fingers. This would never have happened in the old days. Dear Star, I really enjoyed the article Dog Days of Athens by Charly Montgomery. While our version of Western culture has not extended that much tolerance to canines, it nevertheless reminded me of less oppres- sive times in Columbia when a certain number of charis- matic pooches ran free, often picking people out to spend the day with. I particularly remem- ber two Charming mutts who canvassed the Five Points/ Shandon area for years. Unfortunately, and gradual- ly, a more "Dog Nazi" atti- tude prevailed, and the streets of Columbia are now safely sterile. Where Montgomery left me was right after she commented: "while all were skinny, their eyes held none of that dog sadness that most cast out pets acquire." I was right there with her until the next sentence: "I'm not sure whyAthenians care so little for their canine friends." I would allow not one of those dogs would trade places with an over weight, leashed, barking, chained dog over here in the land of the free. Go Greece young dog, go Greece. Sincerely, Cony E. Mason It seems to me that the discussion of the creeks and storm drains not being able to handle stormwater is a bit like closing the gate after the cows are out. Thirty-twomil- lion dollars to fix a problem that is a watershed problem not a culvert/storm drain problem doesn't make sense. Too many impervious surfaces from roofs to park- ing lots and streets are the obvious culprits, and some good ideas were put forth such as pervious paving and green roofs, which should be area incorporated in the plan. The watershed must capture the water before it gets to the creeks and clean it! Many cities have gone to the raingarden concept and not only captured the water on site but cleaned it as well plus saving millions of dol- lars. These landscaped depressions look beautiful, and the proper plants can tolerate the flooded condi- tion (as well as a drier condi- tion) while slowing the flow of stormwater to a seepage rather than a flood. Biologi- cal processes take care of toxic substances. Even lawns, while bet- ter than paving, are not extremely efficient at absorbing stormwater. Trees, however, are extreme- ly efficient at stabilizing water tables. The city could save millions by incorporating rain gardens at key collecting places all over the Five Points watershed. Raingar- dens are lovely landscaped additions in the yards ofpri- vate homes as well as busi- nesses. Also planting more trees will increase the num- ber of natural areas which will act as "sponges" han- dling water as mother nature does. As a b'onus, the trees and green roofs clean and cool the air! Manmade engi- neered solutions sometimes do not work quite as well as original natural solutions. Charlene Nash, aquatic horticulturist